Estimation of fOX2 based on Fe-Mg exchange in olivine-orthopyroxene in magnetite buffered assemblages

This is based on the following equilibrium (see classic paper of Frost 1982, JPet)

6FeX2SiOX4+OX2=3FeX2SiX2OX6+2FeX3OX4 (1)

Oxygen fugacity can be expressed as follows

logfOX2=3logaFeX2SiX2OX6opx+2logaFeX3OX4mt6logaFeX2SiOX4ol+ΔG°1/(ln(10)·RT) [Eq. 1]

In order to derive this expression, let's start as

ΔGo+RTlnK=0

where

K=(aFeX2SiX2OX6opx)3+(aFeX3OX4mt)2(aFeX2SiOX4ol)6+aOX2fl

and

RTlnK=3RTlnaFeX2SiX2OX6opx+2RTlnaFeX3OX4mt6RTlnaFeX2SiOX4olRTlnaOX2

the activity of OX2 is

lnaOX2=3lnaFeX2SiX2OX6opx+2lnaFeX3OX4mt6lnaFeX2SiOX4ol+ΔG°1/RT

but we want log10 units instead so,

logfOX2=3logaFeX2SiX2OX6opx+2logaFeX3OX4mt6logaFeX2SiOX4ol+ΔG°1/(ln(10)·RT) [Eq. 1]

Formal derivation

The above treatment is obscure in the definition of ΔG°1 because it is calculated at the P,T conditions for all endmembers except for OX2 that is computed at 1 bar. The derivation is as follows

6FeX2SiOX4+OX2=3FeX2SiX2OX6+2FeX3OX4 (1)

for this reaction in solid solution we have

3gfso+2gmto6gfaoμOX2o+RTlnK=0

Which is strictly

ΔGo+RTlnK=0

then

3gfso+2gmto6gfaoμOX2o+3RTlnaFeX2SiX2OX6opx+2RTlnaFeX3OX4mt6RTlnaFeX2SiOX4olRTlnaOX2

but noting that

μOX2=μOX2o+RTlnaOX2

that simplifies to

3gfso+2gmto6gfaoμOX2+3RTlnaFeX2SiX2OX6opx+2RTlnaFeX3OX4mt6RTlnaFeX2SiOX4ol

then

μOX2=3gfso+2gmto6gfao+3RTlnaFeX2SiX2OX6opx+2RTlnaFeX3OX4mt6RTlnaFeX2SiOX4ol

we normally report this value as fOX2, that by definition is

fOX2=exp(μOX2μOX21barRT)

fOX2=exp(3gfso+2gmto6gfaoμOX21bar+3RTlnaFeX2SiX2OX6opx+2RTlnaFeX3OX4mt6RTlnaFeX2SiOX4olRT)

 

fOX2=exp(3gfso+2gmto6gfaoμOX21barRT)+3aFeX2SiX2OX6opx+2aFeX3OX4mt6aFeX2SiOX4ol

or in ln units

lnfOX2=3gfso+2gmto6gfaoμOX21barRT+3lnaFeX2SiX2OX6opx+2lnaFeX3OX4mt6lnaFeX2SiOX4ol

and more frequently (lnx=log10xln(10))

log10fOX2ln(10)=3gfso+2gmto6gfaoμOX21barRT+3lnaFeX2SiX2OX6opx+2lnaFeX3OX4mt6lnaFeX2SiOX4ol

log10fOX2=3gfso+2gmto6gfaoμOX21barln(10)RT+3logaFeX2SiX2OX6opx+2logaFeX3OX4mt6logaFeX2SiOX4ol

which is Eq.1